The fundamental question.
What am I avoiding by taking a covid mRNA vaccine? It's all about the Spike.
I want to begin this post by saying there is at least a small but shrinking element of good faith in my fundamental question to understand what anyone avoids by taking a covid-19 mRNA vaccine. Perhaps there is a benefit to some people, but I have no idea who they are and apparently neither do the scientists pushing the jabs. Or do they?
It’s not as though there’s no answer to the question, we are answered everyday. We’re told that children as young as 5 and adults at any age can avoid death by getting the jab. Ok fine, but anyone can avoid choking to death as well by never eating. You get my point.
ITS ALL ABOUT THE SPIKE
My understanding (correct me if I’m wrong) is that it is the spike protein in both the virus and the vaccines that is causing havoc in certain patients. For those individuals who do not experience moderate or severe symptoms from natural infection it is because their own immune system has sufficiently dealt with the spike protein and their own immune response has not reacted poorly or wildly to combat the spike protein. On the other side are those who do not have an immune response that effectively deals with spike protein and have moderate or severe reactions to natural infection. Their immune system reacts wildly and attacks healthy cells and organs.
Doesn’t the vaccine do the same thing?
The mRNA vaccines induce our bodies to make spike protein. The vaccine induced spike proteins were designed to stay at the injection site and degrade within hours, but we now know that isn’t true. The vaccine induced spike proteins do not stay at that injections site, they have been found throughout the body and they have been found intact AND AT GREATER CONCENTRATIONS UP TO 8 WEEKS LATER! They don’t degrade within hours and they are not removed from the body as designed. We don’t know how long they remain because studies only went out to 8 weeks.
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(22)00076-9?rss=yes#relatedArticles
Dr. Mobeen takes a look at and breaks down studies that demonstrate where vaccine spike protein goes and how long it remains.
One study says that infection hospitalization rate is 2.1% but is over-estimated by a factor of 10. So .21 people who are infected get sick enough to require hospitalization.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33729203/
I think that’s a fair starting point to start calculating who may significantly benefit from a vaccine, if the vaccine created no harm. But isn’t it the spike protein causing harm in the .21% of people who require hospitalization? If spike protein is the harming agent, how is it ever a benefit to inject a chemical that causes your body to produce spike proteins that circulate throughout your body? And worse they stay in your body for a period of time that nobody knows. And if your own immune system is equipped to deal with spike protein as is evidently the case for 99.79% of us why would you introduce a synthetic spike protein that may be worse than the natural one and does nothing more than your existing natural immune system.
If anyone knows the mechanism for benefit that I’m missing here, please let me know and include what percentage of the population we’re talking about.
As I see it, nobody avoids spike protein through vaccination or infection.
Create your profile
Only paid subscribers can comment on this post
Check your email
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.